1 John 2:18 o[ti (1) {B}

The reading that best explains the origin of the other readings appears to be o[ti, which is strongly supported by a* B C Y 1739 al. The conjunction is lacking in a few witnesses (A L 1881 al), thus making a more direct statement. The definite article, which is not present in a* B C Y 1739 al (showing that the word was understood as a proper name), was supplied by scribes in a number of witnesses, including a2 A L 1881 al, in order to identify Antichrist more forcefully.

Continues after advertising
Continues after advertising

Old Testament