HEBREWS 10:1 ouvk auvth,n {A} The substitution of kai, for ouvk auvth,n in the earliest known copy of the Epistle (î46) has produced an interesting reading, but one that certainly cannot be original, for the construction of the sentence implies a contrast between eivkw,n and skia,. The other readi... [ Continue Reading ]
HEBREWS 10:9 poih/sai After poih/sai the Textus Receptus adds o` qeo,j, with ac L* 81 104 206 462 489 913 919 1739 2127 vg syrp, h with * _al_. This addition, which is clearly a secondary assimilation to ver. Hebrews 10:7 and/or to the Septuagint text of Psalms 39:9, is absent from î13, 46 a* A C... [ Continue Reading ]
HEBREWS 10:11 i`ereu,j {A} The reading avrciereu,j (A C P 88 614 syrp, h with * copsa, fay arm eth) appears to be a correction introduced by copyists who recalled Hebrews 5:1 or Hebrews 8:3. In any case, the reading i`ereu,j is well supported by early and diverse witnesses (î13, 46 a D K Y 33 81 1... [ Continue Reading ]
HEBREWS 10:34 desmi,oij {B} The reading that best explains the origin of the others is desmi,oij, which is supported by good representatives of both the Alexandrian and the Western types of text, as well as by several Eastern witnesses (A Dgr* 33 (81) 1739 itar, b vg syrp, h, pal copsa, bo arm Ephr... [ Continue Reading ]
HEBREWS 10:38 di,kaio,j mou evk pi,stewj {B} Influenced by the citation of the same Old Testament quotation in Romans 1:17 and Galatians 3:11, where Paul omits the personal pronoun mou( î13 and the majority of later witnesses (Dc Hc K P Y 81 614 _Byz Lect_), followed by the Textus Receptus, omit th... [ Continue Reading ]