LUKE 14:5 ui`o.j h' bou/j {B} The oldest reading preserved in the manuscripts 13 seems to be ui`o.j h' bou/j. Because the collocation of the two words appeared to be somewhat incongruous, copyists altered ui`o,j either to o;noj (cf. Luke 13:15) or to pro,baton (cf. Matthew 12:11). Several witnesse... [ Continue Reading ]
LUKE 14:17 e[toima, evstin {C} In view of the expression pa,nta e[toima in the Matthean parallel ( Matthew 22:4), it is natural that many copyists should have added pa,nta, either after evsti,n or before e[toima. As between evsti,n and eivsi,n, the preponderant weight of witnesses supports the for... [ Continue Reading ]
LUKE 14:27 Through homoeoteleuton the entire verse has been accidentally omitted in M* R G 29 47 57 60 69 71 213 245 482 544 659 692 1279 1574 syrs copboms *.... [ Continue Reading ]