Revelation 5:6 ta. @e`pta,# {C}

The evidence for the presence of e`pta, before pneu,mata (î24 a 046 1854 2053 2344 2432 itgig syrph, h copsa, bo arm Hippolytus al) is fairly evenly balanced against the evidence for its absence (A Pvid 1 1006 1611 itar vg eth Irenaeusarm al). From the transcriptional point of view, through confusion with the two previous instances of e`pta, in the preceding line, the word may have been accidentally omitted. On the other hand, copyists may have inserted the numeral in imitation of Revelation 1:4; Revelation 3:1; Revelation 4:5. In order to represent the ambiguities of external and internal considerations, the Committee decided to print the word, but to enclose it within square brackets, thus indicating doubt whether it belongs in the text.

Continues after advertising
Continues after advertising

Old Testament