ROMANS 5:1 e;comen {A} Although the subjunctive e;cwmen (a* A B* C D K L 33 81 itd, g vg syrp, pal copbo arm eth _al_) has far better external support than the indicative e;comen (aa B3 Ggr P Y 0220vid 88 326 330 629 1241 1739 _Byz Lect_ it61vid? syrh copsa _al_), a majority of the Committee judged... [ Continue Reading ]
ROMANS 5:2 @th|/ pi,stei# {C} It is doubtful whether the words th|/ pi,stei belong to the text or not, for the weight of external evidence is almost evenly balanced between their inclusion (a A C K P Y 33 1739 _Byz Lect_ itdc, 61 vg syrp, h, pal) and their omission (B D G 0220 itd*, g copsa). Furth... [ Continue Reading ]
ROMANS 5:6 e;ti ga.r … e;ti {C} Although it must be acknowledged that the reading ei; ge … e;ti (B copsa) possesses a certain inherent fitness which, despite its very slender external support, makes it most attractive, a majority of the Committee could find no adequate reason why, if this reading w... [ Continue Reading ]