ver. Philemon 1:6 evn h`mi/n {B}

Instead of evn h`mi/n the Textus Receptus reads evn u`mi/n, strongly supported by î61 a G P 33 1739 Byz itg, 61 vg syrp, h copsa, bo arm al. The Committee preferred evn h`mi/n, which is perhaps slightly less well supported (A C D K Y 81 614 itd syrhmg al), because it is more expressive and because, standing amid other pronouns of the second person singular and plural, h`mi/n was more likely to be changed by copyists to u`mi/n than vice versa.

Continues after advertising

Old Testament