Philippians 4:7

PHILIPPIANS 4:7 noh,mata {A} In order to diversify still further the domains covered by kardi,aj and noh,mata, several Western witnesses (F G ita, d) replace the latter with sw,mata, while î16vid adds kai. ta. sw,mata after noh,mata.... [ Continue Reading ]

Philippians 4:8

PHILIPPIANS 4:8 e;painoj {A} After e;painoj, the scribes of several Western witnesses (D* F G ita), not wishing to leave e;painoj without specification, added evpisth,mhj (“[If there is any] praise of understanding”). The word evpisth,mh does not otherwise occur in the New Testament.... [ Continue Reading ]

Philippians 4:13

PHILIPPIANS 4:13 me {A} In order to identify who it is that strengthens Paul, the Textus Receptus, following several of the later uncials and many minuscules, adds Cristw|/. If the word had been present in the original text, there would have been no reason to omit it.... [ Continue Reading ]

Philippians 4:16

PHILIPPIANS 4:16 eivj th.n crei,an moi {C} The preposition eivj is lacking in several witnesses, including î46 A Dgr* 81 330 451 1241 2492 syrh goth eth; it seems to have been omitted either accidentally after di,j (diceic) or deliberately in order to provide a direct object for the verb evpe,myate... [ Continue Reading ]

Philippians 4:19

PHILIPPIANS 4:19 plhrw,sei {B} Instead of the future indicative (“My God will supply …”), strongly supported by î46 A B D2 K L P and many minuscules, the scribes of several Western and other witnesses preferred the aorist optative (“May my God supply …”).... [ Continue Reading ]

Philippians 4:23

PHILIPPIANS 4:23 tou/ pneu,matoj Although some have supposed that the reading tou/ pneu,matoj was introduced by copyists from Galatians 6:18 or Philemon 1:25, the Committee was impressed by its distinctly superior attestation (î46 a* A B D F G P 6 88 104 241 322 330 424c 436 442 463 1319 1898 2005... [ Continue Reading ]

Continues after advertising

Old Testament