Therefore Another reading of the Gr. gives For. Evidence of MSS., &c. is strong on both sides: but the internal evidence, in the coherence of the argument, is decidedly for "For." Romans 3:28 is then a resuméof what has gone before; a brief restatement of the "law of faith:" q. d. "for this iswhat our facts go to prove, that a man is justified, &c."

If "therefore" is retained, this verse begins, or rather forms, a new minor paragraph, summing up indeed what has preceded, but with no bearing on what follows. If "for" is adopted, Romans 3:27; Romans 3:29 are in close connexion: the Jew's boasting is "excluded," because the "law of faith" is as much for the Gentile as for the Jew. "We conclude" should rather be we reason, we maintain.

Continues after advertising
Continues after advertising