1 Corinthians 15:5

1 CORINTHIANS 15:5 dw,deka Instead of recognizing that dw,deka is used here as an official designation, several witnesses, chiefly Western, have introduced the pedantic correction e[ndeka (D* F G 330 464* it vg syrhmg goth Archelaus Eusebius Ambrosiaster Jerome Pelagius mssacc to Augustine John-Da... [ Continue Reading ]

1 Corinthians 15:10

1 CORINTHIANS 15:10 @h`# su.n evmoi, {C} The reading h` eivj evme, (î46 syrhmg goth Theodoret) is an assimilation to the expression in the first part of the verse. It is more difficult to decide whether h` was accidentally omitted from several witnesses (a* B D* F G 1739 it vg) or mechanically ins... [ Continue Reading ]

1 Corinthians 15:14

1 CORINTHIANS 15:14 u`mw/n {B} Although several important witnesses (including B Dgr* 33 81 330 1739) read h`mw/n, this may be either itacism for u`mw/n or mechanical assimilation to the previous h`mw/n. In any case, the context seems to require “your faith” as a correlative to “our preaching”; co... [ Continue Reading ]

1 Corinthians 15:31

1 CORINTHIANS 15:31 @avdelfoi,(# {C} On the one hand, the absence of avdelfoi, from î46 D F G L Y 1739 _Byz Lect_ itd, g is surprising, just as the presence of the word in an affectionate asseveration is to be expected. On the other hand, however, because of strong external support for inclusion o... [ Continue Reading ]

1 Corinthians 15:47

1 CORINTHIANS 15:47 a;nqrwpoj (2) {A} The reading that best accounts for the origin of the others is a;nqrwpoj, supported by a strong combination of early and good witnesses representing several text-types (a* B C D* G 33 1739* itd, g, 61 vg copbo _al_). The insertion of o` ku,rioj (Marcion preferr... [ Continue Reading ]

1 Corinthians 15:49

1 CORINTHIANS 15:49 fore,somen {B} Exegetical considerations (i.e., the context is didactic, not hortatory) led the Committee to prefer the future indicative, despite its rather slender external support (B I 38 88 206 218 242 630 915 919 999 1149 1518 1872 1881 syrp copsa eth _al_).... [ Continue Reading ]

1 Corinthians 15:51

1 CORINTHIANS 15:51 ouv koimhqhso,meqa( pa,ntej de. avllaghso,meqa {A} The reading which best explains the origin of the others is that preserved in B Dc K P Y 81 614 _Byz Lect_ syrp, h copsa, bo goth eth _al_. Because Paul and his correspondents had died, the statement pa,ntej ouv koimhqhso,meqa s... [ Continue Reading ]

1 Corinthians 15:54

1 CORINTHIANS 15:54 o[tan de. to. fqarto.n tou/to evndu,shtai avfqarsi,an kai. to. qnhto.n tou/to evndu,shtai avqanasi,an {B} The shorter reading, o[tan de. to. qnhto.n tou/to evndu,shtai th.n avqanasi,an, supported, with trifling variations, by several important witnesses (î46 a* 088 0121a 0243 17... [ Continue Reading ]

1 Corinthians 15:55

1 CORINTHIANS 15:55 ni/koj* pou/ sou( qa,nate( to. ke,ntron* {B} Two sets of variant readings are involved, both connected with the fact that in Hosea 13:14 the Septuagint differs from the Hebrew. The sequence ni/koj … ke,ntron, strongly supported by î46 a* B C 1739*vid vg copsa, bo _al,_ is to be... [ Continue Reading ]

Continues after advertising

Old Testament