Hebreus 8

VIII.

The mode in which this chapter is introduced shows that, in the writer’s own arrangement, a new division of the argument begins here. On examination we shall find that there is a clear difference between the topics discussed before and after this point; though it was hardly possible, and certainly was not the intention of the writer, strictly to maintain this distinction in every particular. Hitherto the personal characteristics of the High Priest have occupied the chief place: from this point to Hebreus 10:18 it is His ministration that is brought before us. Hebreus 5:1 sets forth whatever there is of similarity between Jesus and the high priests of the Law: the principal subject of Hebreus 7 is the contrast between the priest of whom Salmos 150 speaks and all others, in respect of dignity (Hebreus 7:4; Hebreus 7:9), right of priesthood (Hebreus 7:8; Hebreus 7:16), mode of appointment (Hebreus 7:20), duration of office (Hebreus 7:23), and freedom from sin (Hebreus 7:26). Interwoven with this contrast is another — between the former dispensation, which has failed to attain its purpose, and the new covenant and better hope (Hebreus 7:11; Hebreus 7:18; Hebreus 7:22). The same kind of comparison is continued in the rest of the section, and not between the high priests only, but also between the covenants to which their ministry belongs. First the writer dwells on the place in which the high priest ministers (Hebreus 8:1; Hebreus 9:1), then on his ministration, and especially the sacrifice which he presents (Hebreus 8:6; Hebreus 9:6 to Hebreus 10:18). In Hebreus 8:7 (Hebreus 9:15), Hebreus 10:15, is introduced the thought of the contrasted covenants.