Josué 13:21

The princes of Midian... which were dukes of Sinon, dwelling in the country. —

The conquest of the Midianites is recorded in Números 31. The orders given were, “Avenge the Lord of Midian” (Josué 13:3); “avenge the children of Israel of the Midianites” (Josué 13:2), because they tempted Israel to idolatry and uncleanness. But this verse in Joshua supplies us with a further reason for hostilities between Midian and Israel. The Midianites were “dukes of Sihon,” and a part of his government. Through them he appears to have exercised his dominion over the conquered territory which he had taken from Moab. This land Israel had now, in turn, taken from him. But in order to its complete subjugation, the removal of Sihon’s dukes, the princes or kings of Midian, was also necessary. This was brought about in the manner described in Numbers 22-25,, Números 22:31. The relation between Midian and Moab which is implied, but not explained in Numbers, is explained by the apparently casual remark in this place. It is another example of undesigned agreement between Joshua and the Pentateuch. Of the same kind is the allusion to Balaam, as (Josué 13:22) the soothsayer, or diviner. In Numbers we do not read of anything but prophecy and counsel as coming from Balaam’s lips; but it is abundantly evident, from hints scattered through the story, that he was a sooth-sayer, or diviner, as well as a prophet. The elders of Moab and Midian went to him with the reward of divination in their hands (Números 22:7); “Neither is there any divination against Israel” (Números 23:23) the word in each of these places is radically connected with the epithet applied to Balaam here. (Comp. Números 24:1 : “He went not, as at other times, to seek for enchantments” — where a different word is employed.) He is thus shown to have been an unscrupulous man, who, if he could not obtain the knowledge that he desired from above, would not hesitate to seek it from below, that he might secure his base gain.