Levítico 10:1

X.

(1) And Nadab and Abihu. — Immediately after the Divine manifestation of God’s acceptance of the services connected with the institution of the priesthood, and whilst the congregation are still giving utterance to their profound expressions of thankfulness and joy, the assembled people see a most daring act of sacrilege committed by two of the five newly-installed priests, and have to witness the most awful punishment which befals the offenders. The offenders are the two eldest sons of Aaron, who had received the high distinction to be invited to accompany their father and Moses to the summit of the hallowed mount (Êxodo 24:1); the lesson to the Israelites being that the priests, though mediators between God and the people, are beset with the same infirmities as the laity, and must not presume upon their office.

Took either of them his censer. — The sin of Nadab and Abihu was of a complicated nature, and involved and consisted of several transgressions: — (1) They each took his own censer, and not the sacred utensil of the sanctuary. (2) They both offered it together, whereas the incense was only to be offered by one. (3) They presumptuously encroached upon the functions of the high priest; for according to the Law the high priest alone burnt incense in a censer. (Sec Levítico 16:12; Números 17:11.) The ordinary priests only burnt it on the golden altar in the holy place (Êxodo 30:7), or on the brazen altar as a part of the memorial. (See Levítico 2:2; Levítico 2:16, &c.) The case of Korah and his company was an exception, since it was ordered by Moses for an especial purpose (Números 16:6). (4) They offered the incense at an unauthorised time, since it was apart from the morning and evening sacrifice.

And offered strange fire. — They filled their vessels with common fire instead of taking it from the holy fire of the altar, which was always to be used in burning incense. (See Levítico 9:24; Levítico 16:12.) It is with reference to this practice that we are told — “And the angel took the censer and filled it with fire off the altar” (Apocalipse 8:5). Ancient tradition says that Nadab and Abihu had partaken too freely of the drink offering, and performed their service in a state of intoxication, when they were incapacitated to distinguish between what was legal and illegal. So general was this tradition that it is actually embodied in the Palestinian Chaldee Version of Levítico 10:9, which contains the solemn warning against wine to those engaged in the service of the sanctuary, and which is regarded as a sequel to this awful catastrophe. Others, however, suppose that the phrase “strange fire” denotes not offered according to the prescribed law, just as “strange incense” is used in the sense of incense not prepared in the manner ordered by the Law (Êxodo 30:9).

Before the Lord. — This may mean before the door of the sanctuary (see Levítico 1:5), or in front of the holy of holies. (See Levítico 4:6.) As the dead bodies are said in Levítico 10:4 to have lain in the court of the tabernacle, the former must be the meaning in the passage before us.

Which he commanded them not. — According to a figure of speech frequently used in Hebrew, where the negative form is used for the emphatic affirmative, this phrase is better rendered, “which he had strongly forbidden them.” Though the command is only expressed in Levítico 16:12, there can hardly be any doubt that it was previously given by Moses, since it is implied in Levítico 1:7; Levítico 6:12. A similar reference to a well known statement, though not here recorded, we have in the following verse.