Hebreos 12:16

Lest there be. — Better (as in the last verse), whether there be. Though Jewish tradition (see, for example, the Targum of Palestine on Génesis 25:29) affirms that Esau was a man of impure life, it is not probable that he is so represented in this verse. Here he is mentioned as a type of “the profane,” who care not for divine things, but only for the gains and pleasures of this world.

Who for one morsel of meat. — Better, who for one meal sold his own birthright (Génesis 25:29). We cannot suppose that the writer has in thought the material rights of the firstborn, such as his claim on pre-eminence and, possibly (see Deuteronomio 21:17), on a larger share of his father’s possessions.

Tradition relates that, up to the time of Aaron, priestly functions were discharged by each firstborn son (comp. Números 3:5); and to the line of the firstborn would seem to belong that “blessing of Abraham” (Génesis 28:4) which every one who shared Abraham’s faith would earnestly desire to possess.